Stijn Pel vs Philip Hjorth Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Efficiency: Pel has recently won 40.6% of their second serve points compared to Hjorth's 40.63%. How significant is this difference? It’s minimal, suggesting both players have similar second serve performance.
• Return Game Performance: Pel captures 40.83% of points on opponents' second serves, whereas Hjorth achieves 46.34%. Does Hjorth have an upper hand here? Yes, slightly, indicating a stronger return game against second serves.
• First Serve Returns: Pel wins 30.18% on first serve returns compared to Hjorth's 27.36%, suggesting Pel has a slightly better edge in handling first serves.
• Under Pressure: In saving breakpoints, Pel outperforms Hjorth by saving 59.46% against 52.75%, indicating Pel's resilience under pressure.
• Overall Match Performance: Pel has a higher win rate over the past year at 54.84% versus Hjorth’s 48.15%, pointing to a more consistent performance from Pel.
• Surface Preferences: Both excel on different surfaces, Pel on Clay at 59% and Hjorth on Hard at 59%. The upcoming match surface will be crucial in predicting the outcome.
• Player Engagement Level: Despite similar engagement levels at Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, Pel has a slightly better win record with 54.84% compared to 49.06% for Hjorth.
• Opponent Quality: Pel has faced tougher opponents with an average rank of 207.71 versus Hjorth’s 341.65, which could favor Pel in competitive play.
• Deciding Set Outcome: Pel boasts a stronger deciding set performance winning 43% compared to Hjorth’s 24%, an advantage if the match stretches to a decider.
• Break Point Conversion: Hjorth's conversion rate is 33%, better than Pel’s 27.78%, hinting at Hjorth's opportunistic play in crucial moments.

Editorial Prediction (May 14, 2025, UTC):

As the upcoming match approaches, a close examination of the players' recent performances and statistics indicates a highly competitive encounter. Pel and Hjorth display comparable second serve stats, which sets a foundation of equality in one key area.

However, Hjorth's superior form on return games, particularly against second serves, suggests a potential advantage. Coupled with Hjorth’s effective breakpoint conversion, this could make a critical difference in breaking Pel’s serve.

Nevertheless, Pel’s higher breakpoint save percentage demonstrates composure under pressure, which could neutralize Hjorth's breakpoint opportunities. Pel also has a better track record in deciding sets, hinting at a psychological edge if the match extends.

Given the quality of opponents faced, Pel's experience with higher-ranked players may provide the needed grit and readiness to handle intense match situations. Therefore, despite Hjorth’s strengths in certain areas, Pel's comprehensive skills and experience might tilt the balance in their favor.

Considering all factors, Pel is slightly favored to win this match, leveraging their resilience and broader experience in crucial competitive contexts.